Beyond Accuracy: How Humans Evaluate Legally Correct but Socially Controversial Legal Advice from Machines
arXiv:2607.05680v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI systems are increasingly used to provide legal advice, raising questions about whether laypeople accept guidance from algorithms--especially when that advice is legally correct but socially controversial. We report a preregistered survey experiment with 3,348 adults in mainland China examining how people evaluate identical legal advice when it is attributed either to an AI system or to a human lawyer, and when it is accompanied by reasoning or