When Reporting an AI Security Incident Is Not Mandatory
A recent AI security incident during a frontier model internal evaluation demonstrates the need for better information sharing requirements.
A recent AI security incident during a frontier model internal evaluation demonstrates the need for better information sharing requirements.
On July 13, FPF submitted comments in response to the Colorado Department of Justice’s (the Department’s) pre-rulemaking process for the Colorado Automated Decision-making Act (SB 189) and the Chatbot Safety Act (HB 1263). As lawmakers continue to calibrate a proportionate approach to consumer protection from risks of AI-related harms, Colorado’s two new laws each take […]
<img class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual" src="https://lawfare-assets-new.azureedge.net/assets/images/default-source/article-images/scaling-laws-logo.jpg?sfvrsn=7a7b38eb_3" /><p>Assemblymember Alex Bores ran for Congress on a platform that in many ways centered on AI policy. He therefore drew considerable support as well as substantial opposition from interest groups across the country. Though Bores lost in the Democratic primary, his experience is worth exploring in detail.</p><div data-sf-ec-immutab
The latest edition of the Seriously Risky Business cybersecurity newsletter, now on <em>Lawfare</em>.
Future AI risks will be harder to address ad hoc.