Lawfaremedia

<img class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual" src="https://lawfare-assets-new.azureedge.net/assets/images/default-source/article-images/scaling-laws-logo.jpg?sfvrsn=7a7b38eb_3" /><p>Kal Clark, co-founder of Zauron Labs, joins Kevin Frazier, the AI Innovation and Law Fellow at the University of Texas School of Law and a Senior Editor at Lawfare, to explain how AI is already reducing diagnostic errors in radiology.<br /></p><p>Kal details how Zauron’s AI system functions as a second-look safety layer, revie

A review of Josh Tyrangiel’s “AI for Good: How Real People Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Fix Things that Matter” (Simon & Schuster, 2026).

<p>Washington’s misplaced assumptions around export control and domestic regulations pose strategic risks to national stability.</p>

<p>Cory Doctorow discusses his perspective on artificial intelligence. </p>

Anthropic raised the possibility of a coordinated, verified AI development pause. Antitrust law might prevent that.

Scott Anderson sat down with his <em>Lawfare</em> colleagues Kevin Frazier, Roger Parloff, and Molly Roberts to talk through some of the week’s big news in AI.

As Washington negotiates AI guardrails with Beijing, it must understand why the AI debate in China is so quiet: control, not consent.

Inside the European Union’s latest bid to achieve technological sovereignty.

<p dir="ltr">The orders direct federal agencies to prepare to defend against cryptographic attacks and contribute to U.S. quantum computing innovation.</p>

<img class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual" src="https://lawfare-assets-new.azureedge.net/assets/images/default-source/article-images/scaling-laws-logo.jpg?sfvrsn=7a7b38eb_3" /><p>Alan Rozenshtein, Research Director at Lawfare, spoke with Robert Wright—author of <em>Nonzero</em>, <em>The Moral Animal</em>, <em>The Evolution of God</em>, and <em>Why Buddhism Is True</em>, and the writer behind the NonZero Newsletter and podcast—about his new book, <em>The God Test: Artificial Intelligence and Our Coming

The new AI executive order disclaims a licensing mandate. Federal procurement can impose one anyway.

State regulations mandating AI firms to disclose information may run afoul of the First Amendment. California is an early test case.

<img class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual" src="https://lawfare-assets-new.azureedge.net/assets/images/default-source/article-images/scaling-laws-logo.jpg?sfvrsn=7a7b38eb_3" /><p>In this cross-pod episode, Alan and Kevin join Seth Benzell and Andrey Fradkin of <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/justified-posteriors/id1784022930" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Justified Posteriors</a> to explore a big question: what should AI be for?</p><p>The conversation begins with Pope Leo XIV

The latest edition of the Seriously Risky Business cybersecurity newsletter, now on <em>Lawfare</em>.

Accuracy isn’t enough—agencies must detect when trusted AI misuses legitimate access. Enter: AI counterintelligence.

<p>Biomanufacturing data is a critical strategic asset, and the U.S. is failing to use it.</p>

A cross-post conversation about the AI and cyber executive order, workforce disruption, and the future of education.

The government is using export control law to force Anthropic to cut access to its most powerful models. The legal authority is plausible but the facts remain murky.

The country’s counterterrorism strategy cannot address the range of root causes driving conflict across different regions.